PNWC's Government Contracting Update

A discussion on what's new and trending in Government contracting circles

Pages

  • Home
  • Cost Principles
  • DCAA Small Business
  • CAS Index
  • Defective Pricing (TINA)
  • Compensation Caps
  • Per Diem Rates
  • Cost of Money Rates
  • Find Your DCAA
  • Find Your ACO

Thursday, September 10, 2015

Bidders Have Only Five Days to File a Size Protest

Under SBA (Small Business Administration) regulations, a size protest of a sealed bid procurement is timely if it is received by the contracting officer prior to the close of business on the 5th day, exclusive of weekends and legal holidays, after bid opening (see 13 CFR 121.1004(a)(1)). An untimely protest will be dismissed (see 13 CFR 121.1004(d)).

Last April, VA (Veterans Affairs) issued an invitation for bids for a construction project. The procurement was set aside for service-disabled veteran-owned small business concerns. In May, VA publicly opened bids and determined that a company named C3T was the low bidder.

Subsequent to award, an unsuccessful bidder for the construction project, American Patriot Construction Services files a size protest with the contracting officer challenging C3T's status as a small business. American Patriot alleged that C3T was affiliated with several other concerns through common ownership. The contracting officer forwarded the protest to the SBA Office of Government Contracting (OGC).

The OGC dismissed American Patriot's protest as untimely as it had not been submitted to the contracting officer with five business days after bid opening.

American Patriot was not going to take that dismissal lying down so it filed another appeal, this time to SBA's Officer of Hearings and Appeals (OHA). American Patriot maintained that OGC erred in applying the SBA rules. It should have applied FAR 33.1 which gives it 30 days to file a protest. American Patriot argued that it did not file a challenge to the legality or ability of C3T to bid the solicitation, but rather the legality of awarding this contract to C3T based upon misrepresentation of business size in its Representations and Certifications. American Patriot asserted that C3T illegally obtained the contract by falsely claiming to be a small business and therefore, the contract should be terminated.

OHA affirmed that the size appeal was properly dismissed and gave no credence to the argument that FAR, rather than the SBA rules, applied to the current situation.

Unsuccessful bidders must realize that five days from bid opening rolls around very fast and if there is to be a size protest, they need to act very quickly.



Posted by Paul D. Cederwall at 6:00 AM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: size determinations

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Pacific Northwest Consultants

Pacific Northwest Consultants (PNWC) is a firm of Certified Public Accountants licensed in the State of Washington.

PNWC provides Federal and State Government contract consulting, training, auditing and litigation support to Government contractors and prospective contractors.

Our business philosophy is to provide affordable services to help Government contractors grow their Government business, increase profits, and comply with Government contracting rules and regulations.

For more information, visit our website or call us toll free at 1-866-849-4887. You can also send us your comments or questions using the form below.

QuickBooks Certified

QuickBooks Certified

Contact Form

Name

Email *

Message *

Search The Pacific Northwest Consultants' Blog

Twitter Feed

Tweets by @pacificnwc

Blog Archive

  • ►  2021 (3)
    • ►  December (3)
  • ►  2019 (254)
    • ►  December (20)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (23)
    • ►  September (20)
    • ►  August (22)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (20)
    • ►  May (22)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (22)
  • ►  2018 (258)
    • ►  December (20)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (24)
    • ►  September (19)
    • ►  August (23)
    • ►  July (21)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (23)
    • ►  April (21)
    • ►  March (22)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (23)
  • ►  2017 (256)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (22)
    • ►  September (20)
    • ►  August (23)
    • ►  July (20)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (22)
    • ►  April (20)
    • ►  March (23)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (22)
  • ►  2016 (252)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (20)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (23)
    • ►  July (20)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (21)
    • ►  April (21)
    • ►  March (22)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ▼  2015 (254)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (22)
    • ▼  September (21)
      • National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year...
      • Failure to Report IR&D Expenditures May Render Suc...
      • Company Owned Aircraft
      • Justice Plans to Hold Individuals Responsible for ...
      • Disclosure of IR&D Projects Prior to Incurring Costs
      • Government Awards No-Cost Contract and Competitors...
      • DoD Wants Contractors to Disclose Their IR&D Activ...
      • New Incurred Cost Adequacy Checklist
      • DCAA Revises Its Incurred Cost Proposal Adequacy C...
      • Minimum Wage Rate for Government Contractors Will ...
      • Responsibility Determinations of Prospective Subco...
      • Contractors Cannot Discriminate Against Employees ...
      • Employees Can Discuss Their Compensation Levels Wi...
      • Contractor Employees Plead Guilty for Bribing Gove...
      • Bidders Have Only Five Days to File a Size Protest
      • Earned Value Management System Compliance Review T...
      • Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors
      • Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces - Public Comments - P...
      • Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces - Public Comments - P...
      • Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces - Public Comments - P...
      • Fair Pay and Safe Workplaces - Public Comments - P...
    • ►  August (21)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (21)
  • ►  2014 (256)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ►  November (19)
    • ►  October (23)
    • ►  September (22)
    • ►  August (21)
    • ►  July (23)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (21)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (21)
  • ►  2013 (257)
    • ►  December (21)
    • ►  November (20)
    • ►  October (23)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (22)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (20)
    • ►  May (23)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (21)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (22)
  • ►  2012 (259)
    • ►  December (20)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (23)
    • ►  September (19)
    • ►  August (24)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (21)
    • ►  May (22)
    • ►  April (21)
    • ►  March (22)
    • ►  February (22)
    • ►  January (22)
  • ►  2011 (259)
    • ►  December (24)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (21)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (23)
    • ►  July (20)
    • ►  June (23)
    • ►  May (21)
    • ►  April (21)
    • ►  March (23)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (21)
  • ►  2010 (257)
    • ►  December (23)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (21)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (22)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (22)
    • ►  May (20)
    • ►  April (22)
    • ►  March (23)
    • ►  February (20)
    • ►  January (20)
  • ►  2009 (33)
    • ►  December (22)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (1)
  • ►  2000 (7)
    • ►  November (7)

Links to Other Sites

  • Treasury Rates
  • Where in Federal Contracting
  • Pacific Northwest Consultants

Subscribe To Blog Updates

Posts
Atom
Posts
Comments
Atom
Comments

Labels

  • access to records (18)
  • accounting software (4)
  • accounting system (33)
  • audit standards (4)
  • bid protests (32)
  • billing system (40)
  • business systems (52)
  • CAS (78)
  • CAS Working Group (20)
  • commercial items (14)
  • compensation (75)
  • contract administration (15)
  • contract audit (18)
  • contract closeout (22)
  • Cost Accounting Standards (8)
  • DCAA (65)
  • DCAA watch (47)
  • DCMA (21)
  • defective pricing (34)
  • definitions (8)
  • estimating (10)
  • ethics (22)
  • EVMS (7)
  • FAPIIS (8)
  • FAR 31.201-6 (9)
  • FAR 31.205-18 (6)
  • FAR 31.205-22 (13)
  • FAR 31.205-46 (21)
  • FAR 31.205-6 (38)
  • financial capability (10)
  • fraud (43)
  • Incurred Costs (21)
  • indirect rates (13)
  • internal controls (34)
  • labor (16)
  • lobbying (10)
  • MAARs (8)
  • material costs (9)
  • miscellaneous (72)
  • past performance (15)
  • QuickBooks (11)
  • responsibility determinations (17)
  • SBA (31)
  • small business (54)
  • subcontracts (19)
  • suspension and debarment (12)
  • terminations (15)
  • TINA (22)
  • travel (15)
  • travel costs (15)

Popular Posts

  • Independence of Mind vs Independence in Appearance
    We do not write often on details of auditing standards. We have mentioned Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards (GAGAS) in a broa...
  • Consultants vs. Subcontractors
    There is sometimes confusion concerning whether something or someone is a consultant or a subcontractor. Not only are Government contractors...
  • CAS 403 - Allocation of Home Office Expenses to Segments
    CAS 403 - Allocation of Home Office Expenses to Segments . The purpose of CAS 403 is to establish criteria for allocating home office expens...
  • What Does the ACO (Administrative Contracting Officer) Do?
    People that are new to Government contracting (and we were there once) are often perplexed by similar sounding, yet very different roles and...
  • CAS 410 - Allocation of Business Unit G&A Expenses to Final Cost Objectives
    CAS 410 - Allocation of Business Unit General and Administrative Expenses to Final Cost Objectives . CAS 410 provides criteria for allocatin...
  • How to Find Your Cognizant DCAA Office
    Quick link to DCAA Audit Office Locator . Most Government contractors contractors have no problem in locating the DCAA (Defense Contract A...
  • FAR Threshold for Certified Cost or Pricing Data
    UPDATE: Effective October 1, 2015, the threshold increases to $750,000. See details here . Effective October 1, 2010, the threshold for re...
  • CAS 420 - Accounting for IR&D and B&P Costs
    CAS 420 - Accounting for Independent Research and Development Costs and Bid and Proposal Costs (IR&D/B&P). The purpose of CAS 420...
  • CAS 418 - Allocation of Direct and Indirect Costs
    CAS 418 - Allocation of Direct and Indirect Costs . CAS 418 pertains to direct and indirect costs. It is intended to improve classification ...
  • 2018 NDAA - TINA Threshold to Increase to $2 Million
    The threshold for requiring certified cost or pricing data is currently set at $750,000. This applies to the award of negotiated contracts,...
Consulting Auditing Training Resources About Us

Featured Post

Expressly Unallowable Costs - Raytheon Court of Appeals Decision Broadens the Definition

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit just upheld Raytheon's appealed a decision by the ASBCA (Armed Services Board of Cont...

Copyrighted by PNWC, LLC 2009-2021 . Awesome Inc. theme. Powered by Blogger.